i'm running a 17-85 IS lens and the 70-200 2.8 you linked to.
the 17-85 is an AWESOME piece of gear, very crisp pics.
the 70-200 (non-IS) is awesome for reaching out a bit. i've had very good luck with it so far. unfortunately, for what i really want to shoot, i need at least a 400mm lens. i'm running a 1.4x right now, and have had people suggest running a 2.0x. using a doubler that big will definitely slow the lens down a couple stops, so i've stayed away from it.
not really sure if the 70-200 IS gives any better picture sharpness, since i've never used it. others might know. cost was prohibitive for me on that.
curious....why trade a 20D for a 30D? practically no difference, other than the LCD screen and a bit of camera software changes. same sensor, same body. why not go with the 5D to get the full sensor?
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.